What Is Wrong With Education?

In response to our recent series of articles about Education-related scams, an honored educator suggests that we take a long look at traditional education practices. Perhaps there are better approaches.


What Is Wrong With Education?

Generation after generation of human beings are educated by those who came before. It is how knowledge and survival skills get passed down to maintain continuity of knowledge. Every system of education has its benefits, and its pitfalls. There are those who are well served, and those who fall between the cracks and are lost, sometimes to society itself.

So what is the best way to educate? To know that, we must know what education is. Until we have a working definition, how can we determine how to do it, and judge whether or not we are doing it well?

Education means different things to different people. To some, particularly those who are of religious bent, education is merely indoctrination into the catechisms of a particular faith. It is no accident that, for so long, the only literate people was of the clergy. As knowledge increased and made changes to the way we live our lives, it became imperative that knowledge and skill sets not be lost. Knowledge was passed from master to apprentice, from professional to intern. In this manner, knowledge and skills have been passed from generation to generation, guaranteeing the perpetuity of human knowledge.

Of course, nowadays, we have the greatest repository of knowledge history has known since the Library of Alexandria. It’s called the Internet, and it is loaded with everything you might want to know (as well as some things you probably didn’t want to know). Now that knowledge has been deposited in such a manner, the skills needed these days include the parsing of information to weed out that which is useless for a purpose or just downright false. A basic fund of knowledge in all kinds of subject areas is required for survival in our society. So how do we give that knowledge and development of critical thinking skills?

Schools.

A school is a building where education ostensibly takes place. In the course of a school day, children are shuttled from room to room, from teacher to teacher, to be filled up with knowledge like buckets with water. The classroom might or might not have appropriate resources, the teacher might or might not be familiar with how to make the best use of those resources. There might or might not be enough money in the budget from year to year that the people in the community might or might not vote through for use in obtaining the necessary resources.

The students might or might not have had a good night’s sleep, a place to sleep, or a place to do their work undisturbed. The administration might or might not be concerned with education over what is their usual main concern…maintaining a positive image of the school within the community, no matter what that takes or how big a rug is needed to sweep things under. It is the favorite whipping boy of the community members who are anti-tax, and the funding of schools is inequitable and unsustainable in the extreme.

The students are subjected to standardized testing from year to year to assess…what? Their growth? Their knowledge? Their application of knowledge? Their teacher’s ability to teach to a standardized test? The students are subjected to a one-size-fits-all curriculum (which might or might not be more individualized and differentiated by teachers) and the goal of education is always given as a vague, indefinable “it will prepare you for college/adulthood/etc.”

First, not all students are going to be going to college, and that should not be our goal. Some of our students are going to be going into trades, and our current BOCES system (vocational training in New York), while good, does not go nearly far enough. Apprenticeships need to be brought back. You learn by DOING, and those who learn with their hands are always going to be frustrated in a traditional school setting. There are also lots of children who will be going on to more artistic pursuits, and the resources are seldom available for them to realize these dreams unless parents have great walloping scads of cash available to send their tots off to an appropriate private institution.

Also falling between the cracks are the truly gifted children, those who excel in an academic environment. So much in the way of time and resources are used to address discipline issues and just get the kids to shut up so that a class can take place, that the bright student quickly gets bored and shuts down. Honors classes help, but when honors classes are opened to anyone, and pressure is brought to bear to make sure everyone succeeds, once again the time, effort and resources are weighted towards the lower end. High school used to be stratified, but the “one-size-fits-all” mentality that pervades public education at the present time frowns at “tracking” students into levels of ability, fearing that it will stigmatize those who are in the “lower” track. Meanwhile, those in the “higher” track are made to pay the price.

What is wrong with education? Pretty much everything.

Unless we as a society start to glamorize intelligence and real achievement based on making a positive and material contribution to society instead of glamorizing people on “reality” TV shows, we will never make education attractive enough for our young folks to buy into. Until we get those who learn with their hands out of formal schools and into apprenticeships, where they can finally be free, until we treat our best and brightest students AS our best and brightest students, we can never have real progress in education.

Education must be student-centered, not school-centered, teacher-centered or administrator-centered. Once we recognize that, maybe we can work on fixing the problem.